What makes an own Wikisource subdomain that much better than storing the content on OldWS? The disadvantage with an automatic approval of Wikisources I see is that while a community might be big enough to maintain 1 project, it does not automatically mean they will also be able to maintain 2 of them.
Regards, Leon > Op 30 nov. 2015 om 15:53 heeft Milos Rancic <[email protected]> het volgende > geschreven: > > Yes, from "Wikimedia Foundation Language Committee"... My Gmail has > taken this description by default from somebody... > > So, first, MF-Warburg says Georgian Wikisource should go regularly. > > I suggest Neapolitan Wikisource should go fast forward. > > And I suggest we amend the rules which would say something like "After > the first project created, community can get Wikisource at any point > of time." -- or whatever appropriate. > > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Gerard Meijssen > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hoi, >> You are not. My bad, it shows as wikimedia, I thought it was wikimedia-l >> Thanks, >> GerardM >> >>> On 30 November 2015 at 15:24, Milos Rancic <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Gerard, we are talking here via the list [email protected]. Am I >>> missing something? >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Gerard Meijssen >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hoi, >>>> The right mailing list is the mailing list of the language committee. All >>>> its members are subscribed to that one. >>>> Thanks, >>>> GerardM >>>> >>>>> On 30 November 2015 at 14:14, Milos Rancic <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 1:08 PM, MF-Warburg <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't understand. If ka.ws fulfills the activity requirements, it can >>>>>> be approved. Did anyone check it already? >>>>> >>>>> No :) I am a bit out of regular LangCom duties, so I actually asked that >>>>> inside of the first email. >>>>> >>>>> On the other side, I do think we should make WS requests approval much >>>>> quicker, as in the most of the new requests, it will be used for language >>>>> preservation. >>>>> >>>>> Gerard, may you explain what do you think with "It is the wrong >>>>> mailinglist for that." What's the right method to discuss this in your >>>>> opinion? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Langcom mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Langcom mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Langcom mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Langcom mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom > > _______________________________________________ > Langcom mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
