+1 from me as well
--
Oliver Stegen, PhD
Linguistics Consultant, SIL Uganda-Tanzania
_http://sil.academia.edu/OliverStegen_
On 30-Nov-15 11:26 PM, Amir E. Aharoni wrote:
Yes, let's approve them.
--
Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי
http://aharoni.wordpress.com
“We're living in pieces,
I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore
2015-11-30 16:53 GMT+02:00 Milos Rancic <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>:
Yes, from "Wikimedia Foundation Language Committee"... My Gmail has
taken this description by default from somebody...
So, first, MF-Warburg says Georgian Wikisource should go regularly.
I suggest Neapolitan Wikisource should go fast forward.
And I suggest we amend the rules which would say something like "After
the first project created, community can get Wikisource at any point
of time." -- or whatever appropriate.
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Gerard Meijssen
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Hoi,
> You are not. My bad, it shows as wikimedia, I thought it was
wikimedia-l
> Thanks,
> GerardM
>
> On 30 November 2015 at 15:24, Milos Rancic <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>> Gerard, we are talking here via the list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>. Am I
>> missing something?
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Gerard Meijssen
>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
wrote:
>>>
>>> Hoi,
>>> The right mailing list is the mailing list of the language
committee. All
>>> its members are subscribed to that one.
>>> Thanks,
>>> GerardM
>>>
>>> On 30 November 2015 at 14:14, Milos Rancic <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 1:08 PM, MF-Warburg
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't understand. If ka.ws <http://ka.ws> fulfills the
activity requirements, it can
>>>>> be approved. Did anyone check it already?
>>>>
>>>> No :) I am a bit out of regular LangCom duties, so I actually
asked that
>>>> inside of the first email.
>>>>
>>>> On the other side, I do think we should make WS requests
approval much
>>>> quicker, as in the most of the new requests, it will be used
for language
>>>> preservation.
>>>>
>>>> Gerard, may you explain what do you think with "It is the wrong
>>>> mailinglist for that." What's the right method to discuss
this in your
>>>> opinion?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Langcom mailing list
>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Langcom mailing list
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Langcom mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Langcom mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
