Wikidata do not only differentiate between American and British English. I
do not know about Australian English, but Canadian English is there and
supported. I think this is the same rationale for Canadian French.

JP Béland
Aka Amqui

Le lun. 21 nov. 2016 7:54 AM, Oliver Stegen <oliver_ste...@sil.org> a
écrit :

> Thanks, Gerard, for bringing this issue to our attention.
>
> As far as I can see, different Frenches are comparable to different
> Englishes. I understand that we allow a difefrence between American and
> British English. Do we also have separate support for Australian English,
> Indian English, South African English etc?
>
> If we are to differentiate between French French and Canadian French, what
> about Swiss French, West African French etc?
>
> In any case, I agree that such distinctions should be Wikidata only.
>
> Looking forward to hearing your (pl.!) opinion(s) on this, and with best
> wishes,
> Oliver
>
> On 21-Nov-16 12:48, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
>
> Hoi,
> For languages with an ISO-639-3 code it is OK to have Wikidata support
> them. For French and in particular Canadian French the same rationale does
> not exist.
>
> What is our opinion about including Canadian French as a Wikidata only
> language? In my opinion it is only through the same way as it is done for
> British English that this is fine.
> Thanks,
>      GerardM
>
>
>
> https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T151186
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Langcom mailing 
> listLangcom@lists.wikimedia.orghttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Langcom mailing list
> Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom

Reply via email to