Wikidata do not only differentiate between American and British English. I do not know about Australian English, but Canadian English is there and supported. I think this is the same rationale for Canadian French.
JP Béland Aka Amqui Le lun. 21 nov. 2016 7:54 AM, Oliver Stegen <[email protected]> a écrit : > Thanks, Gerard, for bringing this issue to our attention. > > As far as I can see, different Frenches are comparable to different > Englishes. I understand that we allow a difefrence between American and > British English. Do we also have separate support for Australian English, > Indian English, South African English etc? > > If we are to differentiate between French French and Canadian French, what > about Swiss French, West African French etc? > > In any case, I agree that such distinctions should be Wikidata only. > > Looking forward to hearing your (pl.!) opinion(s) on this, and with best > wishes, > Oliver > > On 21-Nov-16 12:48, Gerard Meijssen wrote: > > Hoi, > For languages with an ISO-639-3 code it is OK to have Wikidata support > them. For French and in particular Canadian French the same rationale does > not exist. > > What is our opinion about including Canadian French as a Wikidata only > language? In my opinion it is only through the same way as it is done for > British English that this is fine. > Thanks, > GerardM > > > > https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T151186 > > > _______________________________________________ > Langcom mailing > [email protected]https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom > > > _______________________________________________ > Langcom mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >
_______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
