Then again, how about http://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T137810 for mn-Mong?
2016年12月1日 15:14 於 "Gerard Meijssen" <[email protected]> 寫道： > Hoi, > I am sorry but when people want to localise Klingon in the Klingon script > they are welcome to it. This has nothing to do with the language policy. It > is up to the people at translatewiki.net to decide on that. In the past > their requirement for Klingon was that it had to use the Klingon script. > > The scope of the language committee typically ends with the creation of a > new project. However, in the past we did recommend for the closure of wikis > when the language used was NOT the language advertised. The removal > happened in the end. > > We do and did get involvement in the addition of new languages in Wikidata > for ISO 639-3. The purpose was that they did not wan to add all languages > and having a process where the language committee wisely nodded is what we > have. This is for ISO 639-3 only. > Thanks, > GerardM > > On 30 November 2016 at 12:55, Milos Rancic <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Lydia Pintscher >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 5:13 PM, Milos Rancic <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Yes. The point is then that Wikidata doesn't need approval from us for >> >> any valid BCP 47 combination with a valid ISO 639-3 code and that they >> >> should just consult us just to be sure it's not a nonsense. >> > >> > The consultation part is important for me personally. I don't have >> > enough knowledge on language codes and so on to decide which ones are >> > following a given standard or not. So I'd like some sanity checking >> > from you folks and I got that in the past on tickets in phabricator. >> > Thanks for that. >> >> Yes. I see that the scope of Language committee ends with localization >> implemented into Wikimedia projects (so, theoretically, a subset of >> what's been done on TranslateWiki). In other words, political >> responsibility of Wikimedia Foundation ends there and LangCom is the >> keeper of that level of integrity (no, we don't need Klingon >> localization because its educational value is zero, but it's >> completely valid to make it for fun and implement into some >> non-Wikimedia MediaWiki installations). >> >> Contrary to that, LangCom shouldn't interfere into the content of >> Wikimedia projects, like Wikidata is. But, yes, it's useful to consult >> LangCom in more formal cases, like adding a new language into the >> Wikidata sets. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Langcom mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Langcom mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom > >
_______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
