Then again, how about for mn-Mong?

2016年12月1日 15:14 於 "Gerard Meijssen" <> 寫道:

> Hoi,
> I am sorry but when people want to localise Klingon in the Klingon script
> they are welcome to it. This has nothing to do with the language policy. It
> is up to the people at to decide on that. In the past
> their requirement for Klingon was that it had to use the Klingon script.
> The scope of the language committee typically ends with the creation of a
> new project. However, in the past we did recommend for the closure of wikis
> when the language used was NOT the language advertised. The removal
> happened in the end.
> We do and did get involvement in the addition of new languages in Wikidata
> for ISO 639-3. The purpose was that they did not wan to add all languages
> and having a process where the language committee wisely nodded is what we
> have. This is for ISO 639-3 only.
> Thanks,
>       GerardM
> On 30 November 2016 at 12:55, Milos Rancic <> wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Lydia Pintscher
>> <> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 5:13 PM, Milos Rancic <>
>> wrote:
>> >> Yes. The point is then that Wikidata doesn't need approval from us for
>> >> any valid BCP 47 combination with a valid ISO 639-3 code and that they
>> >> should just consult us just to be sure it's not a nonsense.
>> >
>> > The consultation part is important for me personally. I don't have
>> > enough knowledge on language codes and so on to decide which ones are
>> > following a given standard or not. So I'd like some sanity checking
>> > from you folks and I got that in the past on tickets in phabricator.
>> > Thanks for that.
>> Yes. I see that the scope of Language committee ends with localization
>> implemented into Wikimedia projects (so, theoretically, a subset of
>> what's been done on TranslateWiki). In other words, political
>> responsibility of Wikimedia Foundation ends there and LangCom is the
>> keeper of that level of integrity (no, we don't need Klingon
>> localization because its educational value is zero, but it's
>> completely valid to make it for fun and implement into some
>> non-Wikimedia MediaWiki installations).
>> Contrary to that, LangCom shouldn't interfere into the content of
>> Wikimedia projects, like Wikidata is. But, yes, it's useful to consult
>> LangCom in more formal cases, like adding a new language into the
>> Wikidata sets.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Langcom mailing list
> _______________________________________________
> Langcom mailing list
Langcom mailing list

Reply via email to