Agreed, counting that the content is indeed written in proper Ingush. On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 12:39 AM, MF-Warburg <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I think Ingush Wikipedia can be approved, from the activity viewpoint. The > translation of the most-used messages is complete > (<http://tools.wmflabs.org/robin/?tool=codelookup&code=inh>) and there has > been a quite high activity since almost ten months now > <https://tools.wmflabs.org/meta/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wp/inh&wiki=incubatorwiki>. > > Now we would of course need verificiation of the content. Searching the > archives, I found a mail from Amir from 10 November 2011. Back then, a > linguist had said the language in the test-wiki was not quite what would be > expected from literary Ingush. However, the current editors are all > different from the ones that were active five years ago. > Amir, could you check with that linguist or someone else from the Ingush > State University again about the quality of the content? > > Best regards, MF-W > > _______________________________________________ > Langcom mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >
_______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
