I agree. > On 31 Dec 2017, at 17:16, Steven White <[email protected]> wrote: > > Well, there was a discussion starting about December 3, 2016 that MF-Warburg > started. Milos and Gerard responded favorably (providing language check was > positive). Amir was concerned the test might have been too stubby. There were > no other comments, and there’s been nothing since (except for discussion > about the lack of response of a language expert). > > The test has been running on Incubator for nearly 11 years. It’s probably > still a little on the stubby side, in my view. But it’s remained active all > year while awaiting “language confirmation”, all the interface translation is > done, and it’s got a lot of pages. And they’ve clearly cleaned up the quality > of the language. So here’s my suggestion: > > • Let’s open a new discussion week here, just for transparency. > • I’d suggest (but of course can’t demand) not letting “stubbiness” get > in the way at this point. When I inform them of approval, I’ll certainly > strongly encourage them to build up the pages they already have going > forward. The community has been active, and its members have been really > patient in continuing to work on for all these years. I think they deserve > our recognition and support at this point. > > Steven > > Sent from Mail for Windows 10 > > _______________________________________________ > Langcom mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
