Was there a reply? 2016-12-05 14:06 GMT+01:00 Amir E. Aharoni <[email protected]>:
> Hi, > > I wrote to the expert. > > I have to say that although the statistics look good, my first impression > is that a lot of articles are still a bit too short. But I'll take a closer > look at more articles, as there are over 700 of them, and I'll wait for the > expert's reply. > > > -- > Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי > http://aharoni.wordpress.com > “We're living in pieces, > I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore > > 2016-12-04 1:39 GMT+02:00 MF-Warburg <[email protected]>: > >> Hi all, >> >> I think Ingush Wikipedia can be approved, from the activity viewpoint. >> The translation of the most-used messages is complete (< >> http://tools.wmflabs.org/robin/?tool=codelookup&code=inh>) and there has >> been a quite high activity since almost ten months now < >> https://tools.wmflabs.org/meta/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&; >> title=Wp/inh&wiki=incubatorwiki>. >> >> Now we would of course need verificiation of the content. Searching the >> archives, I found a mail from Amir from 10 November 2011. Back then, a >> linguist had said the language in the test-wiki was not quite what would be >> expected from literary Ingush. However, the current editors are all >> different from the ones that were active five years ago. >> Amir, could you check with that linguist or someone else from the Ingush >> State University again about the quality of the content? >> >> Best regards, MF-W >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Langcom mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Langcom mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom > >
_______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
