+1 from me as well.
Oliver
On 01-Jan-18 15:40, Michael Everson wrote:
I agree.
On 31 Dec 2017, at 17:16, Steven White <[email protected]> wrote:
Well, there was a discussion starting about December 3, 2016 that MF-Warburg
started. Milos and Gerard responded favorably (providing language check was
positive). Amir was concerned the test might have been too stubby. There were
no other comments, and there’s been nothing since (except for discussion about
the lack of response of a language expert).
The test has been running on Incubator for nearly 11 years. It’s probably still a little on the stubby side, in my view. But it’s remained active all year while awaiting “language confirmation”, all the interface translation is done, and it’s got a lot of pages. And they’ve clearly cleaned up the quality of the language. So here’s my suggestion:
• Let’s open a new discussion week here, just for transparency.
• I’d suggest (but of course can’t demand) not letting “stubbiness” get
in the way at this point. When I inform them of approval, I’ll certainly
strongly encourage them to build up the pages they already have going forward.
The community has been active, and its members have been really patient in
continuing to work on for all these years. I think they deserve our
recognition and support at this point.
Steven
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
