Hoi,
Happy as well with the progress.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 4 December 2016 at 19:42, Milos Rancic <[email protected]> wrote:
> Agreed, counting that the content is indeed written in proper Ingush.
>
> On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 12:39 AM, MF-Warburg <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I think Ingush Wikipedia can be approved, from the activity viewpoint.
> The
> > translation of the most-used messages is complete
> > (<http://tools.wmflabs.org/robin/?tool=codelookup&code=inh>) and there
> has
> > been a quite high activity since almost ten months now
> > <https://tools.wmflabs.org/meta/catanalysis/index.php?
> cat=0&title=Wp/inh&wiki=incubatorwiki>.
> >
> > Now we would of course need verificiation of the content. Searching the
> > archives, I found a mail from Amir from 10 November 2011. Back then, a
> > linguist had said the language in the test-wiki was not quite what would
> be
> > expected from literary Ingush. However, the current editors are all
> > different from the ones that were active five years ago.
> > Amir, could you check with that linguist or someone else from the Ingush
> > State University again about the quality of the content?
> >
> > Best regards, MF-W
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Langcom mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Langcom mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
