DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: In a message dated 98-03-21 14:21:15 EST, you write: << I certainly wouldn't want to be the next guy who is running for the office of President either. Unless this guy came straight out of a monastery, I can't imagine anyone not having something in their background that they don't want people to know. Well then there is Quayle <BG> >> That guy from the monastery would almost certainly have his sexual orientation questioned, Sue. Quayle? No, that's going too far IMO. Doc Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 hallinan
- L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 hallinan
- L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 hallinan
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 moonshine
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 DocCec
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 DocCec
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 hallinan
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 DocCec
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 hallinan
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 moonshine
- L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 William J. Foristal
- L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 Kathy E
- L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 William J. Foristal
