Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hi Doc: LOL You are certainly on the mark about that. :) I don't know that I would want a perfect person in the WH anyway. It would be very difficult to relate to us mere mortals if he was. IMO Sue > That guy from the monastery would almost certainly have his sexual orientation > questioned, Sue. Quayle? No, that's going too far IMO. > Doc -- Two rules in life: 1. Don't tell people everything you know. 2. Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 hallinan
- L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 hallinan
- L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 hallinan
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 moonshine
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 DocCec
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 DocCec
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 hallinan
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 DocCec
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 hallinan
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 moonshine
- L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 William J. Foristal
- L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 Kathy E
- L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 hallinan
