moonshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Hi Jackie, > > Good Judge Wright did not base her decision on the law. Judge Wright based > her decision on her own prejudices. She believes that a male employer > showing his manhood to a female employee and telling her to kiss it does not > constitute conduct outrageous enough to constitute an actionable tort. That > is what she said in her decision. The law in no way describes what an > outrageous act is. Judge Wright determined that. > > Do you agree? > Mornin' Terry, I think you need to read the decision. ...Mac Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
- L&I Biased Judge Forgives Clinton Ronald Helm
- Re: L&I Biased Judge Forgives... moonshine
- Re: L&I Biased Judge Forgives... Jackie Fellows
- Re: L&I Biased Judge Forgives... William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I Biased Judge Forgives... Leonard Booth
- Re: L&I Biased Judge Forg... Jackie Fellows
- Re: L&I Biased Judge Forgives... Ronald Helm
- Re: L&I Biased Judge Forg... William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I Biased Judge Forgives... hallinan
- Re: L&I Biased Judge Forg... moonshine
- Re: L&I Biased Judge ... William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I Biased Ju... moonshine
- Text of Jones/Cl... Linda D. Misek-Falkoff, Ph.D., J.D.
- Re: Text of ... moonshine
- Re: L&I Bias... William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I Biased Judge ... Jackie Fellows
- Re: L&I Biased Judge Forg... William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I Biased Judge Forg... Jackie Fellows
- Re: L&I Biased Judge ... William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I Biased Ju... Jackie Fellows
