Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
moonshine wrote:
> moonshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >
> > Hi Jackie,
> >
> > Good Judge Wright did not base her decision on the law. Judge Wright based
> > her decision on her own prejudices. She believes that a male employer
> > showing his manhood to a female employee and telling her to kiss it does not
> > constitute conduct outrageous enough to constitute an actionable tort. That
> > is what she said in her decision. The law in no way describes what an
> > outrageous act is. Judge Wright determined that.
> >
> > Do you agree?
> >
>
> Mornin' Terry,
> I think you need to read the decision.
> ...Mac
>
Hi Mac
But that would cause cognitive dissonance
;) jackief
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
--
In the sociology room the children learn
that even dreams are colored by your perspective
I toss and turn all night. Theresa Burns, "The Sociology Room"
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
