[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Ron,
LOL...and I was hoping to be the first. And she never claimed that no
one could sue a sitting president. She ruled that the case should wait
until after Clinton left office. And hindsight has proven that she was
right.
LMAO..so now you are going from a point that she was biased because
Clinton appointed her (wrong) to a point that she will be rewarded for
her decision?
Gee, did you even consider that perhaps her ruling was correct with
respect to what Arkansas law requires?
Bill
On Wed, 1 Apr 1998 19:27:15 -0800 "Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>"Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>Len: No you were not the first to point out my error. I neglected to
>check
>out the sources of my information before making that statement. She
>will
>certainly be at the top of Clinton's list for Federal judgeships, or
>even
>the Supreme Court, if Clinton gets his chance to reward her for this.
>BTW,
>she is the same Judge that sent this to the Supreme Court ( and was
>reversed ) when she claimed that no one could sue a sitting President.
>
>Women have their faults. Men have only two.
>Everything they say. Everything they do.
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
>
_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
