[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Thu, 02 Apr 1998 06:07:38 -0500 moonshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>moonshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>>
>> Hi Jackie,
>>
>> Good Judge Wright did not base her decision on the law. Judge
>Wright based
>> her decision on her own prejudices. She believes that a male
>employer
>> showing his manhood to a female employee and telling her to kiss it
>does not
>> constitute conduct outrageous enough to constitute an actionable
>tort. That
>> is what she said in her decision. The law in no way describes what
>an
>> outrageous act is. Judge Wright determined that.
>>
>> Do you agree?
>>
>
>Mornin' Terry,
> I think you need to read the decision.
>...Mac
Hi Mac,
Please don't confuse him with the facts.
Bill
_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
