Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> Hi Jackie,
>
> Good Judge Wright did not base her decision on the law. Judge Wright based
> her decision on her own prejudices. She believes that a male employer
> showing his manhood to a female employee and telling her to kiss it does not
> constitute conduct outrageous enough to constitute an actionable tort. That
> is what she said in her decision. The law in no way describes what an
> outrageous act is. Judge Wright determined that.
>
> Do you agree?
> Best, Terry
>
Hi Terry
ROTF--agree to a silly statement like that. You must be kidding, right!! She read
all the material and Paula's lawyers did not provide enough evidence. Why is it
that if a judge doesn't render a decision favorable to what people's biases are,
then he/she didn't do the job right. If it had gone the other way, these same
people would be saying "what a great judge." But of course, I am still trying to
figure out how he blocked the door with his arm across it and still manged to get
his hands up her culottes to grab her?? All that acrobatic gyrations ole Bill was
going through and she never moved?? But she passed a lie detector--LOL.
jackief
> "Lawyer - one trained to circumvent the law" - The Devil's Dictionary
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
--
In the sociology room the children learn
that even dreams are colored by your perspective
I toss and turn all night. Theresa Burns, "The Sociology Room"
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
