Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hi Ron: Whether I support her or not, I have to say that she has made it this far without them. So why would she need them now. Sue > That is fine with Paula most likely. It would have been alot like the > Democratic National Committee, supporting her. The radical feminist left > would hardly want to see Clinton proven wrong. Ron -- Two rules in life: 1. Don't tell people everything you know. 2. Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
- L&I NOW Will Not Back Paula Jones Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I NOW Will Not Back Paula Jones Ronald Helm
- Re: L&I NOW Will Not Back Paula Jones Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I NOW Will Not Back Paula Jones Jackie Fellows
- Re: L&I NOW Will Not Back Paula Jones William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I NOW Will Not Back Paula J... Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I NOW Will Not Back Paula J... Jackie Fellows
- Re: L&I NOW Will Not Back Pa... William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I NOW Will Not Back Paula Jones Ronald Helm
- Re: L&I NOW Will Not Back Paula Jones Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I NOW Will Not Back Paula Jones Ronald Helm
- Re: L&I NOW Will Not Back Paula Jones William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I NOW Will Not Back Paula Jones Ronald Helm
