[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Thu, 23 Apr 1998 18:25:17 -0500 Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>
>
>William J. Foristal wrote:
>
>> Hi Jackie,
>>
>> Perhaps a better question than why NOW should support Jones is why
>the
>> right wing whacko's, who have never cared about women's rights in
>the
>> past, and who have tried to defeat any legislation designed to
>protect
>> women's rights, are now so concerned about them. As always, their
>> transparency is what destroys their credibility and intelligent
>groups
>> like NOW recognize the wisdom of keeping a very safe distance from
>these
>> political manipulators.
>>
>> Bill
>>
>
>
>
>> Hi Bill
>
>You are right, as Ireland pointed out when she reported why NOW was
>not
>supporting Paula. But, of course, NOW is not supporting Paul, the
>truthful,
>sweet little innocent because they are all enanamored with Clinton
><TIC>.
>Funny, that someone has to be a Clinton lover if they don't go along
>with
>this political crap.
>
>jackief
HI Jackie,
I guess it's too much to expect the Clinton haters to have a lucid
thought or two at this late stage of the process. <G>
Prejudice and bias are quite blind when it comes to rational and critical
thinking.
Bill
_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
