"Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Perhaps a better question than why NOW should support Jones is why the >right wing whacko's, who have never cared about women's rights in the >past, and who have tried to defeat any legislation designed to protect >women's rights, are now so concerned about them. Because the usual left wing whackos, whose civil liberties stand I support, have all of a sudden bought into Hillary's and your "Vast Right Wing Conspiracy Theory" and taken a schizophrenic stand to go against what they were founded to do, and that is support women's rights. They need to be more consistent. Ron 99 percent of lawyers give the rest a bad name. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
- L&I NOW Will Not Back Paula Jones Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I NOW Will Not Back Paula Jones Ronald Helm
- Re: L&I NOW Will Not Back Paula Jones Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I NOW Will Not Back Paula Jones Jackie Fellows
- Re: L&I NOW Will Not Back Paula Jones William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I NOW Will Not Back Paula J... Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I NOW Will Not Back Paula J... Jackie Fellows
- Re: L&I NOW Will Not Back Pa... William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I NOW Will Not Back Paula Jones Ronald Helm
- Re: L&I NOW Will Not Back Paula Jones Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I NOW Will Not Back Paula Jones Ronald Helm
- Re: L&I NOW Will Not Back Paula Jones William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I NOW Will Not Back Paula Jones Ronald Helm
- Re: L&I NOW Will Not Back Paula Jones William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I NOW Will Not Back Paula Jones hallinan
- Re: L&I NOW Will Not Back Paula Jones William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I NOW Will Not Back Paula Jones Ronald Helm
