Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
William J. Foristal wrote:
> Hi Jackie,
>
> Perhaps a better question than why NOW should support Jones is why the
> right wing whacko's, who have never cared about women's rights in the
> past, and who have tried to defeat any legislation designed to protect
> women's rights, are now so concerned about them. As always, their
> transparency is what destroys their credibility and intelligent groups
> like NOW recognize the wisdom of keeping a very safe distance from these
> political manipulators.
>
> Bill
>
> Hi Bill
You are right, as Ireland pointed out when she reported why NOW was not
supporting Paula. But, of course, NOW is not supporting Paul, the truthful,
sweet little innocent because they are all enanamored with Clinton <TIC>.
Funny, that someone has to be a Clinton lover if they don't go along with
this political crap.
jackief
> _____________________________________________________________________
> You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
> Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
> Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
--
In the sociology room the children learn
that even dreams are colored by your perspective
I toss and turn all night. Theresa Burns, "The Sociology Room"
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
