[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Wed, 22 Apr 1998 17:23:47 -0500 Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>
>
>Ronald Helm wrote: Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>
>>
>> >Sue
>>
>> That is fine with Paula most likely. It would have been alot like
>the
>> Democratic National Committee, supporting her. The radical feminist
>left
>> would hardly want to see Clinton proven wrong. Ron
>>
>
>Ron
>
>Why is NOW membership all radical feminists? That seems to be quite
>the
>stereotype. Of course, I really don't know of any right wing feminist
>groups--now that is an oxymoron if I ever heard one. I guess women
>just
>don't like the right wing agenda--broke, barefoot and living on the
>edge of
>town. Now that is a great stereotype of the the right wingers, I
>think
>
>jackief
Hi Jackie,
Perhaps a better question than why NOW should support Jones is why the
right wing whacko's, who have never cared about women's rights in the
past, and who have tried to defeat any legislation designed to protect
women's rights, are now so concerned about them. As always, their
transparency is what destroys their credibility and intelligent groups
like NOW recognize the wisdom of keeping a very safe distance from these
political manipulators.
Bill
_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
