[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Thu, 23 Apr 1998 16:31:59 -0700 "Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>"Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>
>They instead are throwing their support to the case that is presently
>before the Supreme Court, and are going before Congress, etc and
>lobbying for harder laws concerning this.
>Sue
>
>Good for NOW. This case, supported by NOW, could be potentially much
>more
>harmful to Clinton than Paula Jones case, especially in the Wiley
>mauling.
>Ron
HI Ron,
That's not what the experts are saying, if you can believe the experts.
Apparently this case before the Supreme Court has sufficient differences
from any of the Clinton allegations that it will not affect the Jones
appeal. And the Willey issue is not even a court case, so how could the
Supreme Court ruling affect anything concerning Willey.
And, of course, even if the Jones ruling is overturned they will still
have to convince a jury with respect to liability. But we all know that
the people behind Jones are not as concerned about a successful verdict
as they are about continuing the political damage against the president.
Bill
_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
