>I've been at a conference last week and talked quite a bit there with Robert >O'Callahan (Mozilla NZ). And he's told me that they have now ditched LCMS from >Mozilla due to the fact of the (in-) security patch. They rather went the >approach of re-implementing the parts of colour management that they depend >on.
Well, I'm certainly not happy about their decision, but maybe this would get kids playing war games away from lcms, so we could concentrate on color quality and stability :-) > Potential to implement additional acceleration for rendering (e. g. using > the GPU to perform transformations). BTW, lcms 2.0 has this potential as well. >That's what I feared, but apparently they've got something that at least "sort >of" works. But at least they're some ambitious folks with some money behind >them to make certain things work, which helps. Although it may be quite an >academic advantage. At ICC we have (still) no notice on that. >I have just updated my ctypes based Python bindings. Thanks for the update and for you Python bindings, I tried and they are great! Regards Marti. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com _______________________________________________ Lcms-user mailing list Lcms-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lcms-user
