At 2002-02-28 01:52 -0600, guitarlynn wrote: >No new format to this site, rather each release taking the effort to >update the proposed alternate _download_ mirrors such as Ibiblio, >tucows, freshmeat, Dave Central, etc..... > >Not a proposed split, but rather a defined release of the individual >releases/branches that reside, are supported, and developed within >the umbrella supersite that is LEAF. <snip> >What I'm saying is, you can't download and use LEAF. You can download >and use something (and many things) that were made possible directly >from LEAF. LEAF is a conglomeration of seperate ideas, processes, and >directions with a common ground and brotherhood and /or community. LEAF >is a win-win project for the developers, by the developers.
Lynn, Your description above closely resembles what SF calls a Foundry. I believe we are more than that. In your opinion, are we a "Linux Embedded Appliance Foundry", or are we a project that uses evolution as a development model? In my opinion, we are the latter. About SourceForge.net Foundries http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=6029&group_id=1 >I develop for LEAF, and LEAF only. This is because I like the >individual and sum of all the parts better than anything else >available. The community is great too. Agreed, wholeheartedly. :-) >Proposing a split? Rather, an idea to increase traffic and potential >users back to the place we all call home. My resistance to the idea directly relates to the amount of time and effort that went into gathering everyone under one roof. I'm leery of anything that might lead us back to the fragmentation of the past. -- Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ http://leaf.sourceforge.net/content.php?menu=1000&page_id=4 _______________________________________________ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
