Am Donnerstag, 30. September 2010, 20:56:16 schrieb Erich Titl: > on 30.09.2010 15:43, Mike Noyes wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 14:16 +0200, Erich Titl wrote: > >> at 30.09.2010 13:08, Andrew wrote: > >> > >> > >> So what exactly is missing and what do we gain by using another > >> versioning system, given, I don't know git or mercurial, but I am > >> missing some features of CVS in SVN (mostly automatic comment expansion > >> in the code). > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_revision_control_software > > > > Note: CVS doesn't scale well on the server side (per SF staff). > > CVS can't do diffs of binary files. > > As I said, IMHO binaries do not belong in a 'source' versioning system
Everyone; Mike; is there a place on SF not in cvs/whatever-versioning-system and not in FRS to put binaries (:=lrp packages)? I don't like the idea to clutter FRS more with about 170 packages. kp ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
