On 31 Jan 2011 at 15:59, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[email protected]>, Rob Seaman writes: > >On Jan 31, 2011, at 1:07 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > >Is there really a requirement to render the concept of "universal > >time" meaningless? Or is UTC merely collateral damage from an > >intellectually lazy campaign to "suppress TAI"? > > There is a desire to see computers work reliably together.
It's a rather blinkered view of things to think that the rest of the world needs to change millennia of precedent in order to make things smoother for computers, instead of the computers (and their programmers and engineers) using their ingenuity to make things better for the rest of humanity. I'm saying this despite being a computer geek myself. -- == Dan == Dan's Mail Format Site: http://mailformat.dan.info/ Dan's Web Tips: http://webtips.dan.info/ Dan's Domain Site: http://domains.dan.info/ _______________________________________________ LEAPSECS mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs
