I agree Rob. I am a little surprised to see so many people having a go
at Paynter. I thought he wasn't as bad as people are making out. Granted
he's not match sharp yet, but he was winning headers and his link up
play was good. The ball certainly didn't bounce off him like it does
Bechio. I want to see him get more games so we can judge him when he is
match fit.
Si.
Robert Heath wrote:
FWIW, my view was that Paynter played rather as one might expect; a bit rusty
and lacking sharpness early on, but gradually improving as the game wore on
(then needing to be subbed just about when he was.) Sadly, I felt his lack of
sharpness cost us dearly though...........the timing and manner of the 1st goal
was absolutely crucial, and it all stemmed from Paynter standing flat-footed as
the ball was knocked in to his feet near the centre circle, and allowing the
defender to step in front of him and win it.
I saw enough good things from him in the second half to say though that I would
just about prefer him up front to Becchio. I wanted Paynter to score
desperately........partly to help us win the tie, but even more to make Grayson
at least think about picking him ahead of Becchio. As it is, I am sure Lucky
Luciano will be back for the Portsmouth contest (if fit.)
_______________________________________________
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
To unsubscribe, email [email protected]
MARCHING ON TOGETHER
--
Simon Hart.
Physics Computing & Electronics Service
Department of Physics
University of York
Heslington Email: [email protected]
York, YO10 5DD, U.K. Tel: +44 1904 432273
DISCLAIMER http://www.york.ac.uk/docs/disclaimer/email.htm
_______________________________________________
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
To unsubscribe, email [email protected]
MARCHING ON TOGETHER
