And to say 4-5-1 is the best option because that's what has served us well  all 
season is just wrong. 6 games out of 20 says to me a system that I'd not 
working. 

On 23 Apr 2011, at 18:21, Richard Walker <[email protected]> wrote:

> That's better and you make some good points but it's bollox to say that I 
> have not given respect to Becchio. It's almost unbelievable that a player 
> with such limited ability has managed to bag himself 18 goals costing me £20 
> and making me look stupid at the same time however, total respect for that 
> and he must have something about him.
> Still the truth is (IMO) he has been very lucky this season, he can't control 
> or pass a ball and is much better at falling over than anything else. Just 
> the amount of times he handles the ball to help him control the ball tells 
> it's own story. I think he's done a Job and I can never fault his effort but 
> I'm just being honest when I say he's not the future and he's not nearly good 
> enough to take us forward. I really don't look forward to watching Leeds when 
> he's in the team. I'd hate to think he was our plan for next season.
> 
> And it's nowt to do with the Falklands so you can pack that in.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On 23 Apr 2011, at 13:52, "Richard Naef" <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> Richard, 
>>> 
>>> Rather than typing pathetic little emails like the one below 
>>> how about giving us some of your wisdom about what is going wrong ?
>> 
>> You are totally entitled to your opinion, as I am.  I was a bit pissed after
>> the game so didn't have the brain power for a detailed review.  Even after
>> losing bets and having luci as our top scorer all season, you can't even
>> give the guy the slightest respect, same with all the hate figures you've
>> had over the years, its predicable if a tad boring.
>> 
>> We didn't concede, true, but Reading got what they came for and never really
>> put our 70 yr old centre back combination under much pressure in the first
>> half IMHO because Livermore and Johnson did an excellent covering job.  When
>> Killa came on the game opened up more and both they and us had more chances.
>> 
>> 
>> All in all a good performance if we were still in the top 6, but in the
>> context of needing to win, not so good. I think we would have been better
>> with becchio leading the line.  
>> 
>> as for the 442/451 debate, still think the later suits us better cos we can
>> play snoddy and gradel in that formation and the facts show that luci is a
>> better target man than Paynter or Somma.
>> 
>> I still trust Grayson to know what is best with the resources he has.  451
>> got us to where we are, changing to an untested formation smacks of
>> desperation.  We had 10 shots on target, which I reckon 8 where when Paynter
>> was on,, but I don’t think he had one of them?  I'd love him to succeed as I
>> do with ALL players who put on the White shirt, but until he shows he can do
>> it at this level we've got to keep with someone who can. 
>> 
>> I thought Lichaj had another good game and is probably the best of the
>> loanees we had recently.  The crowd were quiet until the closing stages.
>> 
>> I'm looking forward to Monday, as the team should be confident, will have
>> 5000 committed fans behind them (give or a take a few) and know they have to
>> win big to have any chance of the PO's   
>> 
>> 
>> ttfn
>> 
>> Richard
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leedslist mailing list
>> Info and options: 
>> http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
>> To unsubscribe, email [email protected]
>> 
>> MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it)
> _______________________________________________
> Leedslist mailing list
> Info and options: 
> http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> To unsubscribe, email [email protected]
> 
> MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it)
_______________________________________________
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
To unsubscribe, email [email protected]

MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it)

Reply via email to