Wow. I agree. Sent from my iPhone
On 19 Jan 2012, at 20:48, "Paul Cundell" <[email protected]> wrote: > Mark H wrote: > >> Dave, there is a distinction between primarily match day activities (like >> the bars etc), and the conference centre for example. The former need to >> make a profit but would, I expect, go into the "match day takings" pot. > The >> conference centre is non-match day and should remain separate and > distinct. >> Same for any hotel. >> >> And I would also want their profits go towards improving their product and >> generating more revenue - not to open up franchises/branches elsewhere. I >> believe the business model is simply to ensure the club has revenue > streams >> throughout the year, not just on match days during the season. The > business >> model is not to expand beyond Elland Rd I don't think? > > If non-match day businesses are self-sufficient how do they ensure the club > has revenue streams throughout the year? > If all their 'profits' go towards improving their own product what was the > point in the parent entity investing in them at all? > If the ROI for the parent isn't as good as can be got from the Liquid Gold > account at the Leeds Perm then the investment is misplaced, surely? > If the aim is to give the club 365 days a year income then the profits must > come back to the club on a regular basis otherwise the club only has the > same 22 pay days as it gets without them but without the initial lump sum. > > Cheers > Paul > > _______________________________________________ > Leedslist mailing list > Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist > To unsubscribe, email [email protected] > > PETE CASS (1962 - 2011) Rest In Peace Mate > _______________________________________________ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email [email protected] PETE CASS (1962 - 2011) Rest In Peace Mate
