Well, that would go for any source. If you keep track of you're research, you'd 
know what you have searched and have not. If you added the census as a source, 
it should show up, as any source would, and you would know. If you use the 
census as an event just to track you're research, then, again, all documents 
are events in and of themselves.

--- On Wed, 11/24/10, Randy Clark <[email protected]> wrote:

From: Randy Clark <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Usage model for Legacy events
To: [email protected]
Date: Wednesday, November 24, 2010, 1:34 PM

Now I have to chip in. Without the censuses displaying in order on the 
Individual Information pages how can I easily see which I have and which I 
don't. After being entered as Events they can be (or not be) sourced as desired.


Randy

On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Marc Scott <[email protected]> wrote:

I would have to disagree with the Census being an event. It is a document. The 
census is a tool the government uses to extract information about the 
population. The same as BMD certificates. The "event" of a census would be 
one's place of residence at a specific date, and some other secondary 
information we can extract from the census, such as place and estimated date of 
birth. The census is no more an event than my birth certificate.

 
Just because someone appears in the census doesn't make it an event, I appear 
in my birth certificate, does that make my birth certificate the event? My 
father appears in his DD-214 from the US Marines, does that make his DD-214 the 
event? are land deeds events or documentation of an event?

 
one can use documents any way they will, it's their family history. If we 
follow the logic that a census is an event
 in itself, and not a document (to the event of "residence" and other assorted 
info), than almost any document we get in genealogy can be considered events in 
and of themselves, and we no longer have any sources, just events  


--- On Wed, 11/24/10, Mike Fry <[email protected]> wrote:


From: Mike Fry <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Usage model for Legacy events
To: [email protected]
Date: Wednesday, November 24, 2010, 9:02 AM


On 2010/11/24 16:11, Jean Suplick wrote:

> I understand the mechanics of using events. And I understand the basic
> "use case" whereby you record specifics (date, location) for major

> events like births, deaths, burials, etc., and you associate
> citations, files, notes, etc. All that makes sense
 to me. I even get
> why you might record Occupation or Religion.
>
> What I don't understand is the general context for adding an event
> called "User Story" or "Census" or similar as suggested in various

> email threads. To me these are not events, but are sources. I'm
> surmizing there's a benefit to using Legacy in this way, and I'd like
> to weigh that usage model as I start to embrace Legacy more fully.


First of all, I'd question your idea that "Census" is not an event. A Census
takes place at a specific time and records specific details such as a location.
The resulting documents produced by the Census process are probably Sources, but

the Census that produced them was an Event in someone's life.

I've always maintained that the term "Events" is a misnomer. "Facts" would be a
better word to use. To me, an Event has a time and a place, which is what basic

data entry part of an
 "Event" is all about. Even with the "standard" events as
supplied out-of-the-box, there is no requirement that a date and place is always
entered, and the wording for these "Events" adjusts as necessary to take account

of the missing fields. You can even substitute your own, "standard" wording for
the standard Events.

Also, it is possible to define your own "Events" and these need not necessarily
require the entry of a date or a place. In which case, they become a simple

descriptive mechanism for adding facts to the persons history.

--
Regards,
Mike Fry
Johannesburg



Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp


Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:


   http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp


To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp











Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp









Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp









Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp


Reply via email to