On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 13:30:09 -0700, Howard Cady <[email protected]> wrote:
>This sounds like an important enough problem that the Users Group and Legacy >Support should know the required fix. Please keep us informed. It seems >like the obvious "File Maintenance" > "Check/Repair" solution should have >been a fix and we need to know why it failed. Here are my findings as sent to kb (summarized): >As suspected, the topmost individual going up the chain has 5 sets of >parents. One set (UNKNOWN & UNKNOWN) is marked as preferred. As a result, >going up the chain, which follows preferred parents, stops at UNKNOWN and >UNKNOWN. So, technically speaking, there is nothing wrong with the >database pointers ... there are just too many of them! I don't know why kb has so many extra marriages and sets of parents in his database. I wonder if this isn't a problem with Intellishare? I will have to leave that for users of Intellishare to discuss, since that is not my area of expertise. -- Dennis Kowallek (LTools) http://zippersoftware.com/ltools/index.htm http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ltools P.S. Post in plain text if you want me to read it... Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
