FYI, kb's database appears to be V6. On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 15:33:53 -0500, Dennis M. Kowallek <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 13:30:09 -0700, Howard Cady <[email protected]> >wrote: > >>This sounds like an important enough problem that the Users Group and Legacy >>Support should know the required fix. Please keep us informed. It seems >>like the obvious "File Maintenance" > "Check/Repair" solution should have >>been a fix and we need to know why it failed. > >Here are my findings as sent to kb (summarized): > >>As suspected, the topmost individual going up the chain has 5 sets of >>parents. One set (UNKNOWN & UNKNOWN) is marked as preferred. As a result, >>going up the chain, which follows preferred parents, stops at UNKNOWN and >>UNKNOWN. So, technically speaking, there is nothing wrong with the >>database pointers ... there are just too many of them! > >I don't know why kb has so many extra marriages and sets of parents in >his database. I wonder if this isn't a problem with Intellishare? I will >have to leave that for users of Intellishare to discuss, since that is >not my area of expertise. Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
