On 14/11/2012 20:22, Ron Ferguson wrote: > I thought that I had done it again, that is to say got wrong because I > hadn't tested! Whilst most reports do not now allow the printing of source > images, the Individual Report does, and gives the sizing option. > > I have now run a couple of pages off, and if you are saying that there is a > loss of quality between the original and the printed report I would agree, > although I suspect that this is likely to be because I reduced the size of > my stored Legacy source images due to memory limitations on my (very) old > machine.
I thought I remembered that we had discussed here before that Source Pictures don't print well in Reports, so I just tried one this afternoon to confirm my suspicions. The picture I used was a Census that I hadn't re-sized at all. Within Legacy I can zoom way way in and it's still perfectly readable. For the Individual Report I sized it to 15cm width and it was too blurred to read. -- Jenny M Benson Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
