It does seem to vary though. I looked at a birth cert. which had been reduced in size, and that was very poor - but so was the image. But a baptism certificate which was the original size was fine. As you will know, the latter is a lot smaller than the former.
If I just wanted a copy of the images then I would print directly from the image, and not use Legacy at all. I am not absolute clear about the aim of the OP.. Ron Ferguson http://www.fergys.co.uk/ GOONS #5307 "Jenny M Benson" <[email protected]> wrote: >On 14/11/2012 20:22, Ron Ferguson wrote: >> I thought that I had done it again, that is to say got wrong because I >> hadn't tested! Whilst most reports do not now allow the printing of source >> images, the Individual Report does, and gives the sizing option. >> >> I have now run a couple of pages off, and if you are saying that there is a >> loss of quality between the original and the printed report I would agree, >> although I suspect that this is likely to be because I reduced the size of >> my stored Legacy source images due to memory limitations on my (very) old >> machine. > >I thought I remembered that we had discussed here before that Source >Pictures don't print well in Reports, so I just tried one this afternoon >to confirm my suspicions. > >The picture I used was a Census that I hadn't re-sized at all. Within >Legacy I can zoom way way in and it's still perfectly readable. For the >Individual Report I sized it to 15cm width and it was too blurred to read. > >-- >Jenny M Benson Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
