2,943

Kathy

On 11/11/2013, at 2:26 PM, Bruce Jones <[email protected]> wrote:

> Your example helps to see your problem.
> Just curious, how many locations do you have in total?
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 8:17 PM, Kathy Thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
> I do understand that Bruce, but when I first started I would simply put in 
> (as examples)
> Angus
> Brechin angus (complete with no capital and no comma)
> Angus Scotland (again, complete with no comma)
>
> so you see, I can't very well sort like the program can do because Angus 
> isn't going to come up in the first position if there are no commas there
>
> Hence I need a search feature to help me find all of these stray locations so 
> that I can actually get things organised and standardised.
>
>
>
>
> On 11 November 2013 14:06, Bruce Jones <[email protected]> wrote:
> Kathy,
> When they say to "standardize" your location, it doesn't mean they have to 
> have a specific number of positions, just that they need to be entered in a 
> consistent manner; i.e. either from smallest to largest or from largest to 
> smallest, regardless of the number of positions. So,
> If you have locations entered as follows:
>
> Sublimity, Marion, Oregon, USA
> Marion, Oregon, USA
> Oregon, USA
> Salem, Marion, Oregon, USA
> 123 Anystreet, Sublimity, Marion, Oregon, USA
>
> they are consistently entered from smallest to largest.
> Then, go to "View", "Master Lists", "Location"
> Click on "Sort"
> Click on "Right to Left" on Direction of Sort
> Then they will be listed as
>
> USA, Oregon
> USA, Oregon, Marion
> USA, Oregon, Marion, Salem
> USA, Oregon, Marion, Sublimity
> USA, Oregon, Marion, Sublimity, 123 Anystreet
>
> So, all the Oregons will be together, all the Marions will be together, all 
> the Sublimitys will be together etc.
>
> This may or may not help you, but I wanted to make sure you understood what 
> is being said.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Kathy Thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
> Michele - to get my locations consistent, I need to be able to find the 
> locations in the first place.
> I am not good with geography, never have been, never will be.
> To ensure I don't "stuff up" I need to do all of one place at the one time - 
> in other words, I need to do all the Angus places at once, then move on to 
> Fife, then move to Perthshire, and then eventually move to Oklahoma, and so 
> on.
> Given that only the USA uses 4 parts to their place names, and all of my 
> other locations are 3 part or have "extras" like suburbs or cemetery names, 
> sorting them according to fields isn't working for my current location 
> database.
> Right now I'm ready to give up on this aspect of standardisation because it's 
> just way too complicated and difficult to work out how best to standardise 
> everything in a way that makes sense and looks good - ie no , , gaps just 
> because my family doesn't live in America.
>
> Regardless of the above though, putting in a search field for "Any Place" 
> will also allow me to search for (as an example)
> Individual > Any date > Contains > 1900
> Individual > Any Place > Contains > Angus
> and get a result list of only those people who are recorded as living in 
> Angus in 1900, regardless of how standard or non-standard my locations list 
> is.
>
>
>
>
>
> On 11 November 2013 10:06, Michele/Support <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> Kathy,
> If you have your locations entered in a consistent manner (Legacy is a true 
> database program that uses fields) the sort feature is great and it is fast.  
> The only time you would have a problem with the sort is if you don’t enter 
> your locations in a consistent manner.  Even though it would be a lot of work 
> initially you might want to go through all of your locations and get them 
> changed over to the standard format.  The good news is, the changes are 
> global.  You can also combine locations if you have two identical locations 
> entered differently.  Once you have your locations in Legacy this way you 
> will be able to manipulate your data more efficiently.  One hint, as you get 
> each location "cleaned up" you can tag it so that whenever you go back to 
> work on the locations again, you will know exactly which ones have been done 
> and which ones haven’t.  Another hint, you might want to go ahead and put in 
> short locations at the same time and check the geocoding.
>
> When I switched from FTM to Legacy in 2005ish I had to do this.  At that time 
> FTM had no way to check the locations like Legacy did/does (FTM might now, I 
> have no idea) so I had my locations entered every which way.  It took some 
> time but it was well worth the effort.  Once it was cleaned up it was no 
> problem because then I entered the locations the correct way.
>
>
> Michele
> Technical Support
> [email protected]
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com
>
> From: Kathy Thompson [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2013 6:38 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Search for all people in one county
>
> What a convoluted time consuming way that could easily be solved using one 
> simple search for "Individual > Any Place > Contains > Angus" that I can 
> think print out a list of names from and the whole process is over and done 
> with in 2 minutes tops.
> I'm glad that some people have been able to keep there Locations list in an 
> organised way so that they can simply sort it and get all the Angus locations 
> together - why do you think I need to have an "Any Place" search ability?
> So I can get my locations sorted and organised and standardised.
> (As well as other reasons)
> I've just spent 10 minutes tying to find all my Angus locations as you 
> suggested - I doubt I even have half of them yet - because of the 
> non-standard way the locations have been entered over time
> If I have to do this for every single possible location - I'll go stark 
> raving nuts!
>
> Please Legacy, just add in a "Any Place" option for the search and you wont 
> have people getting frustrated like I am.
> (Yes, I've submitted a feature request)
>
>
>
> On 11 November 2013 07:52, Brian/Support <[email protected]> wrote:
> View > Master Lists > Location
> The sort options are on that screen using the sort button
> That is also where both Michele and I gave you a way to find those using
> the locations. Michele by selecting each in turn and I by using
> CTRL-Click with the mouse to select every location containing Angus
> County then, with all the locations selected use the Option Button (Not
> the List Option Button) to select Show list.
> That will show everyone using the selected locations which is what you
> are looking for.
>
> Brian
> Customer Support
> Millennia Corporation
> [email protected]
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com
>
> We are changing the world of genealogy!
> When replying to this message, please include all previous correspondence.
> Thanks.
> On 10/11/2013 4:46 PM, Kathy Thompson wrote:
> > This is what I want to do
> >
> >> If you want everyone in Angus (in the county and within towns in that 
> >> county) you can still do it using the Master Location List.  Just sort 
> >> your list so that all of the Angus locations are together and then it is 
> >> easy to look at each list and tag them.  It doesn’t take long at all 
> >> because under each location you can select List Options and then Tag 
> >> Everyone in List.  It takes about 2 seconds for each location.
> >
> > But I cant do this because I can't search the location list for only the 
> > Angus locations.
> > And there is no way that I can recall all of the Angus locations I've 
> > entered
> > You say I can sort the locations list?
> > Maybe someone need to tell me how to do that, because I can't figure that 
> > out.
> > Also, given that I do not have empty fields in my locations , ie "Oathlaw, 
> > , Angus, Scotland", I just have "Oathlaw, Angus, Scotland" is this going to 
> > affect any sorting process?
> > And no, I do not want o have the extra , , in all of my locations when they 
> > are not needed.
> >
> >
> > Kathy
> >
> > On 10/11/2013, at 10:40 PM, "Michele/Support" 
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> So you are wanting to find people that are listed in a county but not 
> >> listed in that same county if they are listed in a specific town?  In 
> >> other words, you only want to see those listed in Angus, Scotland and not 
> >> anyone that is listed in a specific town in Angus?
> >>
> >> I would do that in the Master Location list.  All you have to do is find 
> >> the entry that is only , Angus, Scotland and tag those people.
> >>
> >> If you want everyone in Angus (in the county and within towns in that 
> >> county) you can still do it using the Master Location List.  Just sort 
> >> your list so that all of the Angus locations are together and then it is 
> >> easy to look at each list and tag them.  It doesn’t take long at all 
> >> because under each location you can select List Options and then Tag 
> >> Everyone in List.  It takes about 2 seconds for each location.
> >>
> >>
> >> Michele
> >> Technical Support
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com
> >>
> >> From: Kathy Thompson [mailto:[email protected]]
> >> Sent: Saturday, November 9, 2013 9:50 PM
> >> To: [email protected]
> >> Subject: [LegacyUG] Search for all people in one county
> >>
> >> Does anyone know if there is a simple way to search for all the people who 
> >> I have recorded as living in one county (or state or even country)?
> >>
> >> I am finding that as I get more into the filling out of minute details, I 
> >> am needing to collate together all of the people who lived in a certain 
> >> county or state.
> >> And as a person might be located somewhere for an event other than a birth 
> >> death or marriage, a three tiered search repeated dozens of times is not 
> >> helpful when trying to cover any one of a multitude of event possibilities.
> >> I need to be able to collect everyone who has a county or state (or even 
> >> as wide as a specific country) listed for me as a result of a single 
> >> search return.
> >> I know that we can do an "Any date" search, but I can't see an "Any place" 
> >> search.
> >> This kind of search is not possible by going to "locations" as that will 
> >> only show people in specific towns, or other locations as specifically 
> >> entered, it can not show me everyone who I have recorded as living in 
> >> Angus Scotland (for example), it will show me Oathlaw Angus Scotland, or 
> >> Brechin Angus Scotland, but not Angus Scotland (unless I have entered that 
> >> location for someone without a more specific town, but even then it's only 
> >> for that one or two people, not the possibly 150 who lived in Angus 
> >> Scotland)
> >>
> >> I've submitted this as a feature request, but since we are unlikely to get 
> >> any minor updates before Legacy 8 comes out, and this request might not 
> >> even come out in the first few minor updates after that, I still need to 
> >> find all of the people in one county in a quick and easy manner.
> >>
> >> Aside from the repeated searches with different criteria, is there ANY way 
> >> I can do this with a minimum of fuss and bother?
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >>
> >> Legacy User Group guidelines:
> >> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> >> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
> >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> >> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
> >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> >> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> >> Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and 
> >> on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
> >> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
> >>
> >>
> >> Legacy User Group guidelines:
> >> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> >> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
> >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> >> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
> >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> >> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> >> Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and 
> >> on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
> >> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
> >
> >
> >
> > Legacy User Group guidelines:
> > http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> > Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> > Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> > Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> > Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on 
> > our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
> > To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
> >
> >
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on 
> our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on 
> our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on 
> our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on 
> our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on 
> our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on 
> our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on 
> our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Reply via email to