I've made two attempts at creating a vignetting correction profile for a wide 
lens (Olympus 12/2) and both times ended up with overcorrection when testing on 
real-world images. I didn't have this issue when calibrating the 25/1.8, and 
wonder: is the use of a flat diffuser over the lens face an inherently flawed 
method with lenses that cave substantial curvature to the front element? It 
occurs to me that the distance between element and diffuser is probably twice 
as much at the edges as at the center. On an opaque object this would obviously 
result in signifcantly reduced light at the edges, but I don't understand 
optics well enough to know if this is relevant to the image projected on the 
sensor through a bunch of glass...

If this is indeed the problem, is there a suggested workaround? I was thinking 
of taking the shots of the inside of a softbox or something similar, to 
increase the distance between diffuser and lens.

Thanks,

jys

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors
Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms.
With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE.
Training and support from Colfax.
Order your platform today.http://sdm.link/xeonphi
_______________________________________________
Lensfun-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lensfun-users

Reply via email to