On 8/9/2013 11:31 AM, Terry Brown wrote:
On Fri, 9 Aug 2013 07:54:49 -0700 (PDT)
Dave Loyall <[email protected]> wrote:
Little or nothing has been said about how to track the latest version, or
how to help the user install the latest version.
That's because those aren't goals of the "automatic update feature".
Therefore, I propose to scrap the "update" part and simply implement a ping
feature instead.
I'm sure we'd get much lower opt in with that. You're draft's fine,
but it will get read as
**** ****** ** ***** send information ******** *** ********** ******
** ******** ********** ****** ** *************** ****** ** ********
********** ****** ** ***** ****** ** ******** ********** ******
** *************** ****** ** ******** ********** ******
** *****
and people will click No - that's what I'd do.
If we say "Allow Leo to check for updates?" it's a simpler question,
more people will say yes, and there is the added value of letting
people know about new versions. So, I'd vote for that approach.
Cheers -Terry
Would we be talking full on release updates, or bzr commits?
I'd like the bzr option myself...
-->Jake
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
