On 10/20/2013 7:54 AM, Edward K. Ream wrote:
I am pleased with Leo's new documentation, but as I have just
indicated in the "Just one more chapter?" thread, I do not believe for
a moment that better documentation for Leo has any chance of making
Leo substantially more popular.
So, what *would* make Leo more popular? To make Leo **notable**, as
Wikipedia defines the term:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability In essence, it means:
**There are full reviews of Leo that I didn't write**
Only positive, external, unbiased, widely-read reviews have the
potential to draw lots of people to Leo's home page.
So that's the "grand marketing challenge": to bring such reviews into
being. By definition, I can not write them. Anyone want to try?
Edward
P.S. The notion of "notable" came to my attention in the talk tab of
Leo's Wikipedia entry:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Leo_%28text_editor%29 After a rocky
start, I realized that the editor was saying something valuable.
EKR
Not that it's terribly germane to the conversation, I just found another
mention of Leo in a printed book:
http://books.google.com/books?id=vFsfxWHzQREC&pg=PA59&lpg=PA59&dq=leo%2Beditor%2Bpython&source=bl&ots=GCYHhh6NIi&sig=b6C55nhyJduHaDJSid7WNe0f6is&hl=en&sa=X&ei=DtFjUr7gO9i54AP2-4DYDg&ved=0CG0Q6AEwCDgo#v=onepage&q=leo&f=false
Book: Bioinformatics Programming in Python: A Practical Course for Beginners
Author: Ruediger-Marcus Flaig
-->Jake
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
