So far, so good! Thanks, Kent
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 5:13 AM, Edward K. Ream <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 4:24 AM, Edward K. Ream <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Kent Tenney <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> maybe add p.raw, or p.plain >> >> >> An interesting idea. I think p.nosentinels would be most descriptive. > > > Done on the trunk, including a unit test. All expected unit tests pass. > Notes: > > 1. Unlike p.script, p.nosentinels returns only the body text of the selected > position, stripped of sentinels. > > 2. As the new unit test shows, p.nosentinels properly handles python > decorators. > > Please let me know how this works for you. > > EKR > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "leo-editor" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
