> If you don't want p.nosentinels it would probably be best to get rid of it.
Please no, don't get rid of it! I really want _unadorned node content_, no encoding line, no sentinels, no children: only what I have typed into the current node body. Period. Thanks for providing it, I will now go use it. On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Edward K. Ream <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 9:53:15 AM UTC-6, Kent Tenney wrote: >> >> Per the original post, p.script inserted the encoding line, >> but now it doesn't, our ships passed in the night. >> >> since the encoding line was removed, I think >> p.script == p.nosentinels >> >> correct? > > > p.script gives you the script composed of the node and its descendants > (supports @doc sections, section references, @others, etc.), while > p.nosentinels gives only the p.b stripped of Leo directives. They are > implemented in totally different ways. > > If you don't want p.nosentinels it would probably be best to get rid of it. > > Edward > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "leo-editor" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
