On 2/18/2014 11:34 AM, Kent Tenney wrote:
If you don't want p.nosentinels it would probably be best to get rid of it.
Please no, don't get rid of it!
I really want _unadorned node content_,
no encoding line, no sentinels, no children: only what I have
typed into the current node body. Period.
Thanks for providing it, I will now go use it.
+1
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Edward K. Ream <[email protected]> wrote:
On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 9:53:15 AM UTC-6, Kent Tenney wrote:
Per the original post, p.script inserted the encoding line,
but now it doesn't, our ships passed in the night.
since the encoding line was removed, I think
p.script == p.nosentinels
correct?
p.script gives you the script composed of the node and its descendants
(supports @doc sections, section references, @others, etc.), while
p.nosentinels gives only the p.b stripped of Leo directives. They are
implemented in totally different ways.
If you don't want p.nosentinels it would probably be best to get rid of it.
Edward
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
