On 2/18/2014 10:53 AM, Kent Tenney wrote:
Per the original post, p.script inserted the encoding line,
but now it doesn't, our ships passed in the night.
since the encoding line was removed, I think
p.script == p.nosentinels
correct?
In my testing, p.script is what you want. p.nosentinels is just the
body of p stripped of sentinels, not any ancestor nodes. I've also
noticed that p.nosentinels doesn't strip << section >> references.
-->Jake
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Edward K. Ream <[email protected]> wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 5:21 AM, Fidel N <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Edward, thanks for this.
While we are on it, how about a p.something that returns all the stripped
bodies, including the subtree?
similar to g.getScript but already clean?
Isn't that what p.script does? Iirc, it has no sentinels.
EKR
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
