On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 9:38 AM, vitalije <vitali...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I have lost patience with this discussion. If you want to convince me, >> change leoNodes.py in a git branch and create show how the qt redraw code >> can be improved. >> >> The ball is in your your court. I'm done reading dissertations. >> >> Edward >> > > My first response was: > > It is not fair. I explicitly said that I don't even think it is possible > under conditions you gave. If you tired of this discussion, we don't have > to have it right now. From the history of our discussions I have learned > that after a while Edward will do the right thing that bothers him at the > moment. > > But on second thought I will accept the challenge. > YEEEHAAA!, we are on! Curious, what happens to speed of operations like searching nodes for strings? Only I am not going to play according to the rule "change only > leoNodes.py". Instead I will to try to change as little as possible in > whatever module I find necessary. All that in a separate branch. When I > complete this Edward can look at all the changes and then decide whether to > accept them or not. > > Vitalije > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "leo-editor" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
