Please note I edited my earlier post to clear up some potential ambiguities.
Also, after posting I realised that I also needed to clarify that a clone in the source tree is only considered to be a local clone if it has no clones outside the source tree, in which case those nodes in the duplicated tree will be cloned within the duplicated tree but distinct from the source tree. So a source tree that contains multiple clones within the source tree but also at least one clone outside the source tree is NOT considered a local clone for our purposes. So these clones in the copied tree will be also be clones of those nodes in the source tree. Cheers -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/d164bcc0-c59e-469e-9135-13274859a4da%40googlegroups.com.
