I am rather busy ATM so I can't help much with this. Personally I have felt (more than once) a need for this kind of command in the past. It is hard to make a simple rule that this command should follow to decide which nodes to clone and which nodes to copy. Whatever rule we decide on, it will lead to ambiguous situations when tree changes between copy and paste command.
Perhaps this can be simplified to this command: `paste-retaining-marked-nodes`. User can mark nodes that are to be retaining identity after paste. All other nodes should have new identities after paste. I guess this would be trivial to implement and user would have full power over the effect of the command. Vitalije -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/5ec76be4-4835-4e5f-a97b-34403e874774%40googlegroups.com.
