On 29-Sep-00 at 07:36, Alexander Mai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 07:22:16AM -0400, Rick Scott wrote:
> > Let's not forget misc/test16.motif. A quick run of that, linked with
> > openMotif, and an mgdiff on the output compared to the ouput linked with
> > LessTif (1.2 so we may have some of this covered)....
>
> Before going to strongly promote a 2.x version it would be 'nice'
> if any binary compatibility related issues would have been solved
> as much as possible?
> Or would we accept if some version would again (as in the very old past)
> break BC?
The main thing we have to get "correct" to avoid most of these issues is all
the stuff in th *P.h files. These are available to _everyone_ now (openMotif).
All this info is needed in order to sub-class, therefore fair game. We should
be able to get this right the first time now....
test16 seems to be getting ~50 class pointers into the class_list, but not all
of them are getting used!!! It's as if something is getting optimized out :(
>
> --
> Alexander Mai
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
