On Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 01:52:10PM +0200, Danny Backx wrote:
> Alexander wrote :
> > Before going to strongly promote a 2.x version it would be 'nice'
> > if any binary compatibility related issues would have been solved
> > as much as possible?
> > Or would we accept if some version would again (as in the very old past)
> > break BC?
>
> The OpenGroup (OSF at the time) never ever claimed that 2.0 was binary compatible
>with 1.2.
> It's probably almost impossible.
Oh, I meant BC for our "2.x" project, or 2.0/2.1 whatever you want.
Having the internals incomplete in our 0.92-2.x version would most likely
cause a 0.93 break BC with 0.92.
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
