> ><snip>
> >
> >And talking about free software, OM fails to fullfill terms which
> >at least a majority of involved people agree that are required for being
> >"free", "opensourced", etc., i.e. many people can't use it _legally_.
>
> Is there more to this comment about "_legally_" other than the obvious one
> that people which have chosen to use GPL for their open software can't use
> Open Motif without violating the GPL? I understand that there is a clear
> philosophical issue about using a license agreement that has not been
> approved by opensouce.org.
>
It also means that I can't use OpenMotif on any of my comercial platforms for
_anything_, no matter what license I may want to use. Some of those platforms
do not even have a commercial offering of Motif.
