Re: Missing 2.x stuff

[Danny Backx]

Alexander wrote :
> Before going to strongly promote a 2.x version it would be 'nice'
> if any binary compatibility related issues would have been solved 
> as much as possible?
> Or would we accept if some version would again (as in the very old past)
> break BC?

The OpenGroup (OSF at the time) never ever claimed that 2.0 was binary compatible with 
1.2.
It's probably almost impossible.

        Danny