> I looked through the lfs-dev list threads for all of 2015 and found > no answer.
Further investigation revealed quite a discussion of dbus/attr/acl/libcap in May '14, which I read. I have no intention of using systemd, and never have enabled extended attributes, nor installed attr/acl, so far (as an additional level of complication and maintenance without an obvious cost/benefit payback). I find myself agreeing with the faction that they aren't necessary in LFS (even though there is a point to be made about some of these additions and XML::Parser being widely used in BLFS). But I am similarly reluctant to deviate from the book. I guess, perhaps the point being less obviously buried in the lists, my question is where is all this going? Are these to be serious prereqs? Is LFS abandoning it's minimalist past? -- Paul Rogers [email protected] Rogers' Second Law: "Everything you do communicates." (I do not personally endorse any additions after this line. TANSTAAFL :-) -- http://www.fastmail.com - Access your email from home and the web -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
